I finished Marilynne Robinson’s short collection of essays, Absence of Mind, which are based on lectures she gave regarding the conflict between religion and science. While she is no doubt making a case for religion, this is not a creation versus evolution debate. Her thought process goes much deeper than the “sound bytes” one hears in the news (for either side). She spends her time discussing what constitutes the human mind and the human soul. For anyone who has read much of her work, they understand that she is well-read not just in history, literature and religion, but science, as well. As I’ve mentioned before, I have difficulty writing about essays and it’s no different with this collection. I probably read these essays too quickly. Robinson’s work in general usually takes a little more effort for me. However, a couple of her points interested me.
First, she confronts this idea of being “modern”. According to Robinson, the idea that all things ancient cannot compare to our modern way of thinking doesn’t hold water:
Another factor that seems to me to be equally important is the great myth and rationale of “the modern,” that it places dynamite at the foot of old error and levels its shrines and monuments. Contempt for the past surely accounts for a consistent failure to consult it.
Second, the popular view of science, according to her, has taken out the mystery of the world and the universe. From her viewpoint, true scientists are those that continue to explore, continue to wonder – who haven’t decided that now we know completely how things really work. When reading her ideas about science, an excitement comes off the page that I rarely expect to encounter in one who is discussing religion. While Robinson’s point regarding science seems valid to me, I have to admit that religious people can be equally good at taking the mystery out of the world – sometimes they think they have it all figured out, too. Perhaps this is why Robinson is one of my favorite writers: whether writing about science, history, religion, philosophy or literature, she never takes the wonder and mystery out of the world.
For anyone interested in science – especially psychology, sociology and anthropology – this could be a challenging read, even if one didn’t come to the same conclusions that she does. Her collection When I Was A Child, I Read Books probably would appeal to a broader spectrum of readers.